Coronavirus Outbreak: Part 4

:woman_facepalming:

2 Likes

It’s a very controversial channel, lol. I used to watch it often until I gave up on national news shows all together. They do have good coverage sometimes, like now.

1 Like

:grimacing: I would stay inside for a bit. No idea if this thing was carrying any chemicals or anything. Probably not but just to be safe for a bit. I’m a worry wart though.

2 Likes

We’re not at the house now so we’re good, but it did float over my hometown earlier today.

1 Like

One of our local meteorologist predicted early on that it would travel to the gulf coast, steered by current wind currents. Boy was he wrong. Or it has additional steering mechanisms. So many questions. But no matter what, this balloon was definitely up to no good.

1 Like

Totally just speculating, but I’m guessing it was a test to see how we’d respond. :confused:

2 Likes

If its helpful, ABC just keeps adding brief updates to the top if this page. If you scroll down and click ā€œload moreā€ (that’s on mobile anyway), you can back track through the high level play-by-play.

2 Likes

It certainly wasn’t covert. I hope they start covering the South American one.

2 Likes

Here is the best map I’ve seen yet that includes both.
image

2 Likes

This map is disturbing.

2 Likes

Of course, it could be UFOs and the Chinese are just playing scapegoats. :woman_shrugging:

That would play about right in this timeline, I think…

4 Likes

The ā€œspy balloonā€ definitely went over the St Louis area yesterday. I was chauffeuring the teen around at the time it did, but several of my friends took pictures of it from their yards.

4 Likes

The more I think about it, the more certain I am that our intelligence people had a pretty good idea what was up with it and knew what level of threat it was. Perhaps we were able to eavesdrop on it’s communications? It was a choice to let it proceed. From the ABC feed:

4 Likes

Here’s my other thought on the balloon… why tf didn’t Canada do anything about it? It flew over 2 countries.

3 Likes

Sounds like it was a joint decision to surveil the surveillance balloon. :thinking:

6 Likes

No definitive reports but it was speculated that we could block communications the balloon could send :woman_shrugging: I hope we get answers though and it doesn’t get swept under the rug.

1 Like

I do too, but since intelligence is involved, we might not. Spy games. :woman_shrugging:

2 Likes

My take is that NORAD tracked the balloon very closely from the beginning and there was a conscious, joint US/Canadian decision made at the highest levels to let it proceed, while hiding sensitive military equipment, and ultimately shooting it down in shallow territorial waters to facilitate recovery.

The balloon flew over the Aleutian Islands on Tuesday before it entered Canadian airspace on Wednesday. source

There was a decision to let it proceed and shoot it down over water to avoid potential harm to people on the ground. source.

President Biden said he issued an order Wednesday to shoot it down, but the Pentagon advised waiting until the balloon was over water to safeguard civilians. source

It’s not easy to shoot down balloons, b/c air defense systems and fighter aircraft aren’t designed to deal with balloons. source. An F-22 with an AIM-9X Sidewinder - some of the USAF’s most advanced hardware - brought it down. The F-22 has a higher ceiling that most fighter aircraft (above 50,000’), which may have been relevant here as the missile was fired at 58,000’ while the balloon was between 60-65k feet. source

6 Likes

Yeah I just feel like there is so much negative press about why we let it go as far as it did and I thought well Canada let it fly on through there too so…

4 Likes

I am reading multiple reports that this is not the first time this has happened?

2 Likes