Coronavirus Outbreak: Part 4

Continuing the discussion from Coronavirus Outbreak: Part 3 (Part 1) - #10042 by ehsanchez.

Previous discussions:

4 Likes

How long did that take?? A year??

3 Likes

A year and a half!! The last thread started in July '21.

3 Likes

Should I change it to part 4?

5 Likes

I don’t even read this thread, and I say yes.

1 Like

That’s all I needed was one person to agree!

I can change it back if I offended anyone.

3 Likes

Doesn’t the forum automatically make a new thread when one reaches 10K posts, appending Part X to the name? So there would be no one to be offended but a bot.

3 Likes

Are you new to social media? :crazy_face:

9 Likes

Isn’t the truth?!

1 Like

FOUR?!?!!

Wonder what @Pod ia up to these days :heart:

Peace out pals.

9 Likes

The CDC has reformatted their genomic surveillance data presentation to better emphasize the uncertainty in the most recent 3 weeks of data. :woman_shrugging:



I’m in Region 6, and we’re just coming down from our BQ.1/BQ.1.1 surge. No idea what XBB.1.5 will mean for us. Non-event? Small bump? New surge? :woman_shrugging:



4 Likes

One of the interesting bits from all the data coming out this past week is that the data on the BiV shot isn’t necessarily accurate b/c those few that got that last booster may also be those who mask, distance and use other mitigation measures to avoid catching covid. Hense the efficacy of the BiV booster could be in question.

ETA: or rather, they don’t really know how effective it is b/c there are fewer data points. I’m NOT trying to spread misleading information. I believe the booster is effective but I thought it was interesting that some noted possible issues w/ the data.

5 Likes

I really expected things to start hopping after Christmas break but it’s been quiet. In fact, we’ve averaged more kids on campus regularly so far than last semester.

4 Likes



https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-announces-evusheld-not-currently-authorized-emergency-use-us




We are moving backwards in available treatments. The CDC put out this: :roll_eyes:
image
Yeah, not much groundbreaking there.

There are also concerns about whether we should even be using molnupiravir.


https://twitter.com/theosanderson/status/1619020680313573378?s=46&t=qlIqTB4naPVHFNq8lCb8_g

This is one of the study’s authors. He’s a huge name in the field (i.e., if the study was from anyone else, he’s one that everyone would be looking to for his take on it).


3 Likes

Are you still reading Twitter? I realized this morning that I don’t think I can do that ever again.

4 Likes

You can curate your feed to avoid all the ugly that Twitter is morphing into (I have only read about the ugly and have never actually seen any of it). There are still many scientists posting good information about covid.

6 Likes

It is still the best place to get current Covid info. :woman_shrugging:

I just curate who I follow. (Use the “Following” tab at the top of my feed rather than the default “For You”.)

Multiple takes on any breaking developments, directly from leading people in their fields.

The media outlets reporting is way too dependent on the individual reporters…their personal biases, level of knowledge, etc. (I read so many articles that include bits I know to be outdated or inaccurate that it makes me question the value of anything in the article. I mainly use them as a jumping off point to see what MedTwitter is saying on the topic.)

Several people I follow are making backup plans (mainly Mastodon) but few are leaving completely.

The most challenging bit is there are certain people that I think have particularly bad takes on everything Covid. It’s interesting to follow them to see where their heads are at, but their followers have so harassed some of the people that are highly worth following, there are now tools to block everyone that follows someone specific. The people I value are feeling it necessary to use those blocking tools, and I’m concerned I’ll get caught up in one of those and not see those I really want to see.

5 Likes

This is worth a repost. My edited highlights of comments made in the very first thread in the early months of 2020.

2 Likes

I spy me! Crazy to read our thoughts back then when we know how it turns out. So far, anyway.

2 Likes

This morning is was a RT from a scientist that I have followed for years. There was a purpose for the RT, but I can’t read that any more.

1 Like