If you eat three of them, yes. But probably not if you eat the whole box - then it turns into a meal
Not if you eat just one of them!
ButâŚreally? Who does that?
If you eat three and want it to count as snack, what is the time period for completion?
I think he means how many minutes do you have to eat it in until it becomes three or more separate amuse-bouche
I would say within 10 mins but thatâs just my opinion
I would say it would be the same amount of time as it takes to complete a ride of the TTA People mover.
So Peoplemover is a snack of a ride, vs a full ride?
My kids get distracted and can take all afternoon to eat a snack. Itâs still a snack, even when spread out. (âMom, I didnât get a snack!â would not be true.)
I object! That is not called a snack. When you eat over a long period of time that is called grazing.
Sustained. One cannot call it an amuse bouche and also a lengthy snack. Youâll need to choose one or the other, counselor.
Not a meal! Just several snacks. Or one big one.
ahahahhahha until I remembered the previous post about going into the jungle I thought your pic was proposing eye candy as a snack and thought you had picked a poor example âŚ
Edited to add a good example
Singular. Properly one, or at most two, bites. (They have slammed Top Chef contestants on that one.)
A collection of which becomes a snack. Even if eaten over a prolonged period of time.
If my kids donât eat their dinner because they have been snacking all afternoon, I donât care what the pace was. They were snacking.
But isnât an amuse bouche more than just being a biteâŚbut is about being the perfect bite.
Eating a single pretzel rod in a single bite doesnât make it an amuse bouche.
My husband said this to me once and I basically stopped breathing because he was right and my whole life was a lie